X-From-Line: support@frontbridge.com Wed Jan 10 15:25:43 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: peter@bsdly.net Delivery-date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:26:19 +0100 Received: from rosalita.datadok.no ([194.54.103.66]) by skapet.datadok.no with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1H4kxf-0002XV-77 for peter@bsdly.net; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:26:19 +0100 Received: from outbound-blu.frontbridge.com ([65.55.251.16] helo=outbound6-blu-R.bigfish.com) by rosalita.datadok.no with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1H4kxf-000GBu-3X for peter@datadok.no; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:26:29 +0100 Received: from outbound6-blu.bigfish.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by outbound6-blu-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636601620144 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail164-blu-R.bigfish.com (unknown [10.1.252.3]) by outbound6-blu.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41DCCBE8060 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail164-blu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail164-blu-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3548DE80FC for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:25:32 +0000 (UTC) X-BigFish: VP Received: by mail164-blu (MessageSwitch) id 1168464332482189_30699; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:25:32 +0000 (UCT) Received: from wpgcs04 (tide504.microsoft.com [131.107.0.74]) by mail164-blu.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8E3CB0011; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:25:30 +0000 (UTC) From: To: Subject: [TicketID 66203] [Norway] Datadokumentasjon AS - FrontBridge Support - 1-936599581 [MK] Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:25:43 -0600 X-Gnus-Mail-Source: pop:peter@bsdly.net Message-ID: <002a01c734fd$e4cbcc00$9755399d@northamerica.corp.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 Thread-Index: Acc0/eJ7qqZImoy2T7OqqQ18fhN0uQ== X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Content-Length: 1287 Lines: 31 Xref: thingy.datadok.no mail.misc:664742 Hi Peter I understand you've asked that this case be reveiwed again. I've reviewed the information in ticket 62542 and I'm afraid I have no new information. We have already confirmed that we are not blocking the Datadok.no domain or mail servers. The behavior is that the datadok.no mail is ending up in spam quarantine, this mail is still being delivered and not out right blocked. This is something which is completely preventable via the use of a policy rule on the recipient side which allows this incoming mail. Our customer who initially reported the issue was made aware of this on 12/14/2006 and created a rule on 12/19/2006. This means that any mail from the effected domain to our customer Lionbridge will be delivered. All of our customers dealing with datadok.no would have this option available to them if they are seeing similar issues. Unfortunately I cannot honour the request to provide the spam filter rules which are blocking this mail. The rules are proprietary and as such are not released to clients. We also do not have available the logs displaying when the mail started being marked as spam. If you have any other questions please let me know. Sorry I couldn't be of any more assistance. Regards, Michael Cassils Technical Support Representative, Tier 2